<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for E-Learning 24/7 Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elearninfo247.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elearninfo247.com</link>
	<description>The Truth and Realities of E-Learning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 09:13:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Will the e-learning light finally turn on for all? by Graham Cook (@GrahamCookRSVPD)</title>
		<link>http://elearninfo247.com/2012/05/29/will-the-e-learning-light-finally-turn-on-for-all/#comment-3611</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Graham Cook (@GrahamCookRSVPD)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 09:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elearninfo247.com/?p=2404#comment-3611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Craig,
I think the debate of classroom learning versus online learning is the wrong debate. You almost hit the nail on the head when you say that the problems relate to the fact that learning and teaching in the Corporate world hasn&#039;t evolved sufficently and is due to a relatively strict process that says Corporate classroom learning involves people who
    Still sit in chairs
    Still use some form of a writing device
    Still use some type of item to write on (the most common is paper)
    Still look to the front of the room – and see at least one person talking (the most common, mind you)
    Still raise their hand (and yes, I know many do not) to ask questions
    Still follow a process
 
This isn&#039;t a technology problem, and in fact most Corporate learning needs actually requires group learning, soft skills and behavioural practice, and a host of other &#039;rehearsal&#039; issues that are actually best done with groups of people interacting and learning from each other and a minimal touch from a learning facilitator. There&#039;s no evidence this is done better with e-learning than with live groups - the issue is Corporates increasingly don&#039;t want to spend money getting people together, and can be seduced by video courses or anything else that suggests &#039;content&#039; can be poured into people quickly. Few Corporate training programmes really need this knowledge transfer - its skills application and behavioural change they need. The research on Rich Environments for Active Learning work for example essentially takes what works really well in group learning and applies it to e-learning.

The issue is we need to improve the capability of those designing and leading Corporate training - they can then embrace the available options that technology can provide. Again good research suggests that that the time spent in any kind of off-the-job training opportunity is less impactful in a corporate setting than what happens before and after that training intevention.

Now if we look at performance support and mobile learning then that&#039;s a whole new area that technology can grab for itself ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Craig,<br />
I think the debate of classroom learning versus online learning is the wrong debate. You almost hit the nail on the head when you say that the problems relate to the fact that learning and teaching in the Corporate world hasn&#8217;t evolved sufficently and is due to a relatively strict process that says Corporate classroom learning involves people who<br />
    Still sit in chairs<br />
    Still use some form of a writing device<br />
    Still use some type of item to write on (the most common is paper)<br />
    Still look to the front of the room – and see at least one person talking (the most common, mind you)<br />
    Still raise their hand (and yes, I know many do not) to ask questions<br />
    Still follow a process</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t a technology problem, and in fact most Corporate learning needs actually requires group learning, soft skills and behavioural practice, and a host of other &#8216;rehearsal&#8217; issues that are actually best done with groups of people interacting and learning from each other and a minimal touch from a learning facilitator. There&#8217;s no evidence this is done better with e-learning than with live groups &#8211; the issue is Corporates increasingly don&#8217;t want to spend money getting people together, and can be seduced by video courses or anything else that suggests &#8216;content&#8217; can be poured into people quickly. Few Corporate training programmes really need this knowledge transfer &#8211; its skills application and behavioural change they need. The research on Rich Environments for Active Learning work for example essentially takes what works really well in group learning and applies it to e-learning.</p>
<p>The issue is we need to improve the capability of those designing and leading Corporate training &#8211; they can then embrace the available options that technology can provide. Again good research suggests that that the time spent in any kind of off-the-job training opportunity is less impactful in a corporate setting than what happens before and after that training intevention.</p>
<p>Now if we look at performance support and mobile learning then that&#8217;s a whole new area that technology can grab for itself &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Will the e-learning light finally turn on for all? by Evan Flockhart</title>
		<link>http://elearninfo247.com/2012/05/29/will-the-e-learning-light-finally-turn-on-for-all/#comment-3610</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Evan Flockhart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 08:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elearninfo247.com/?p=2404#comment-3610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a very experienced ILT practitioner...I agree with 99 % of your post. Although I still think that ILT will still has a place in practical skills training -  but more from the &quot;flipped classroom perspective&quot; ( note my background is aviation and leadership development) .  

As for other skills and knowledge, the more elearning the better, just need the light to go from dim to bright!

Evan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a very experienced ILT practitioner&#8230;I agree with 99 % of your post. Although I still think that ILT will still has a place in practical skills training &#8211;  but more from the &#8220;flipped classroom perspective&#8221; ( note my background is aviation and leadership development) .  </p>
<p>As for other skills and knowledge, the more elearning the better, just need the light to go from dim to bright!</p>
<p>Evan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SharePoint &#8211; Social Learning Savior? by Craig Weiss</title>
		<link>http://elearninfo247.com/2011/05/17/sharepoint-social-learning-savior/#comment-3609</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig Weiss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 06:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elearninfo247.com/?p=1515#comment-3609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark, 

Maybe you should forward the blog article over to them. : ) 

Seriously, I see it all the time and its a shame. Once you get into it and realize the issues, problems, etc. is just cascades and the people who lose it - really are the employees (or customers if they enable that route).

Thank u, 

Craig]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, </p>
<p>Maybe you should forward the blog article over to them. : ) </p>
<p>Seriously, I see it all the time and its a shame. Once you get into it and realize the issues, problems, etc. is just cascades and the people who lose it &#8211; really are the employees (or customers if they enable that route).</p>
<p>Thank u, </p>
<p>Craig</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review of ASTD International Trade Expo by Craig Weiss</title>
		<link>http://elearninfo247.com/2012/05/11/review-of-astd-international-trade-expo/#comment-3608</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig Weiss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 06:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elearninfo247.com/?p=2375#comment-3608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Piron is a multi-faceted e-learningshop. They create custom content and other learning solutions. They also provide consulting services and have a LMS, called Flexiguru.  You sign up and take courses on Flexiguru.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Piron is a multi-faceted e-learningshop. They create custom content and other learning solutions. They also provide consulting services and have a LMS, called Flexiguru.  You sign up and take courses on Flexiguru.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on May Edition: E-Learning News and Notes by Online Learning</title>
		<link>http://elearninfo247.com/2012/05/19/may-edition-e-learning-news-and-notes/#comment-3599</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Online Learning]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 05:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elearninfo247.com/?p=2385#comment-3599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a provider of elearning in Australia, I found your post very informative and relative to online learning in this country. Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a provider of elearning in Australia, I found your post very informative and relative to online learning in this country. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review of ASTD International Trade Expo by Richard</title>
		<link>http://elearninfo247.com/2012/05/11/review-of-astd-international-trade-expo/#comment-3585</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 10:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elearninfo247.com/?p=2375#comment-3585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Craig,

Its a wonderful review. Even I liked gamelearn they seem pretty interesting.  Also I was wondering about this new company Piron Corporation. They had this very cute little USB business card which was a very interesting concept and i guess they are into medical learning.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Craig,</p>
<p>Its a wonderful review. Even I liked gamelearn they seem pretty interesting.  Also I was wondering about this new company Piron Corporation. They had this very cute little USB business card which was a very interesting concept and i guess they are into medical learning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SharePoint &#8211; Social Learning Savior? by Mark</title>
		<link>http://elearninfo247.com/2011/05/17/sharepoint-social-learning-savior/#comment-3579</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 02:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elearninfo247.com/?p=1515#comment-3579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Craig.  Just a comment on that I wish the company I am currently contracted to, one of the projects is to implement a SPLMS, read your article before they actually purchased the LMS.  They do use Sharepoint and have skills in managing this but it has taken us 9 months to get the LMS up and running in it&#039;s basic state, mainly due to the amount of configuration required and lack of information on how SCORMS and the LMS interact together.  We are now struggling with how to get the information out to be passed to our main training repositry.  In short it has become a very expensive excercise and if the company had to make the decision again (which I think they may do in the next financial year) they would go for a proven LMS application from a proven vendor]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig.  Just a comment on that I wish the company I am currently contracted to, one of the projects is to implement a SPLMS, read your article before they actually purchased the LMS.  They do use Sharepoint and have skills in managing this but it has taken us 9 months to get the LMS up and running in it&#8217;s basic state, mainly due to the amount of configuration required and lack of information on how SCORMS and the LMS interact together.  We are now struggling with how to get the information out to be passed to our main training repositry.  In short it has become a very expensive excercise and if the company had to make the decision again (which I think they may do in the next financial year) they would go for a proven LMS application from a proven vendor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on E-Learning 101 by Arul</title>
		<link>http://elearninfo247.com/2012/04/19/e-learning-101/#comment-3550</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elearninfo247.com/?p=2323#comment-3550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi AllIt has been really usfeul to read your comments on e-learning tools.  I am seeking comments on a dilemma I have.  We are a small training company that want to develop some of our courses into e-learning packages.  I find it really hard to obtain sound objective advice.  Do I get a company to do this and pay them each year for the licensing and development?  Is is feasible for me to learn to do this myself for the very reason Mike mentioned to ensure it is accessible to all and educational sound?  If I do get a company to do how much should I pay for the service and what pitfalls should I look out for. Do I have to pay them a fee each year for the authorizing tool.  any comments from you guys would be very gratefully recieved]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi AllIt has been really usfeul to read your comments on e-learning tools.  I am seeking comments on a dilemma I have.  We are a small training company that want to develop some of our courses into e-learning packages.  I find it really hard to obtain sound objective advice.  Do I get a company to do this and pay them each year for the licensing and development?  Is is feasible for me to learn to do this myself for the very reason Mike mentioned to ensure it is accessible to all and educational sound?  If I do get a company to do how much should I pay for the service and what pitfalls should I look out for. Do I have to pay them a fee each year for the authorizing tool.  any comments from you guys would be very gratefully recieved</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on May Edition: E-Learning News and Notes by vaibhav</title>
		<link>http://elearninfo247.com/2012/05/19/may-edition-e-learning-news-and-notes/#comment-3544</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vaibhav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 08:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elearninfo247.com/?p=2385#comment-3544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LMS Comparison &#8211; Latest Version by janspan</title>
		<link>http://elearninfo247.com/comparison-tools-templates/lms-comparison-tool/#comment-3519</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[janspan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 16:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elearninfo.com/#comment-3519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent article and LMS information - the template is most helpful! Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article and LMS information &#8211; the template is most helpful! Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

